Institutions ranked by researcher S-Index, dataset SHARE score, and data sharing volume. Rankings draw on scored repositories including Zenodo, EDI, and OpenNeuro.
Rankings based on researcher S-Index and dataset SHARE scores across Zenodo, EDI, and OpenNeuro (min 3 researchers per institution).
Biodiversity Institutions Lead in S-Index
Taxonomy and biodiversity institutions dominate the S-Index rankings, reflecting consistently high metadata quality in natural history collections across Zenodo.
EDI Excels in SHARE Scores
EDI-contributing institutions average 60+ SHARE scores vs Zenodo's 33. Domain-specific repositories with structured metadata requirements achieve systematically higher quality.
Size Does Not Predict Quality
Near-zero correlation (r=0.02) between dataset volume and SHARE scores. Small, focused institutions match or exceed large research universities in data sharing quality.